Home › Forums › Bull Pit for Members Only › Bull Pit for Members Only › Fuel injected 2 strokes old hat it seems
This topic contains 22 replies, has 0 voices, and was last updated by ian 14 years, 4 months ago.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 13, 2010 at 11:55 pm #99282
Well Bruce it seems as though Honda may not be all bad towards the two stroke like has been thrown around here from time to time. This link was written in 2003 when all the two stroke shit started in the states. It seems maybe Honda was being pro active or looking at different avenues? Fuel injection may even be old hat in two strokes it seems, maybe the euro guys can market it as they are first
Interesting regarding the emission from a two stroke “they produce more harmful carbon monoxide and hydrocarbon emissions than four-strokes, putting them outside the realm of on-road emissions laws in America, and outside future requirements of other countries” maybe thats a FACT and why in California (the toughest emission state in the world) two strokes are banned. Maybe not because one manufacturer wanted them gone and slept with the government as some people argue.
An interesting article none the less http://www.motorcycle.com/manufacturer/honda/honda-exp2-14293.html
Honda also ran the same bike in the Dakar which should surely help put paid to the excuse my two stroke isnt any good for long rides.
Anyone seen pics or the KDX250 Michael Goddard used to finish third in the Australian Safari ?? Third on a smoker
TB
December 14, 2010 at 12:59 am #192546hey TB, can you fixy the link please?? it does odd things when you click it
December 14, 2010 at 1:26 am #192552xy-transit wrote:
Quote:hey TB, can you fixy the link please?? it does odd things when you click itFixed
December 14, 2010 at 1:38 am #192547Sounds good. I’m guessing fixing the problem of unburnt fuel coming out with emmisions may have turned out to be harder to fix than expected. 7 years later and still hearing nothing. Maybe it just took too long and they thought people wouldn’t switch back from 4T.
December 14, 2010 at 1:48 am #192553Yeah I dont know Roy the problem does seem to be the unburnt fuel. I read somewhere recently that the new low emission two stroke outboards are helped out by the fact the exhaust is washed through the water (the exhaust exits into the water) and thats the only way they can meet the emission laws
Its interesting for sure
Here is a picture of it in Dakar
December 14, 2010 at 2:41 am #192548On the Sofala Birthday ride last May llewdaert was talking about Fuel Injected 2 Strokes and how some American company has fine tuned this? Maybe Scott can chime in..
Cheers..
December 14, 2010 at 4:45 am #192549“….this is the start of something we have all been waiting for.”
Bwahahahahha
I’m pretty sure using a fuel injector to replace a carby is hardly brain surgery and hardly a complete solution. Neither is spark-less combustion.
Golf-clap for Honda.
December 14, 2010 at 6:46 am #192562just ride a four stroke and you don t have to worry about it with more and better power to boot. ps fuel injected 4strokes use more fuel than carbereted modern 4 strokes anyway .so how would fuel injection fix emision problems with a two stroke
December 14, 2010 at 6:58 am #192574youve started the old argument here rocket, i have to say ( with the 300 that is ) that i find it just as easy to ride as my 510 in the power stakes, i have been caught out a gear to high on the ktm with no chance to change it with out losing all of momentum on a hill and it just laboured up in that gear just like the 510 did
white rocket wrote:[/b]
Quote:just ride a four stroke and you don t have to worry about it with more and better power to boot. ps fuel injected 4strokes use more fuel than carbereted modern 4 strokes anyway .so how would fuel injection fix emision problems with a two strokeDecember 14, 2010 at 7:02 am #192576that was the plan husky ktm bloke (the argument )
December 14, 2010 at 7:42 am #192575white rocket wrote:
Quote:just ride a four stroke and you don t have to worry about it with more and better power to boot. ps fuel injected 4strokes use more fuel than carbereted modern 4 strokes anyway .so how would fuel injection fix emision problems with a two strokeOK well no argument here Rocket
Fuel injection will help it atomise the fuel and oil better in the cylinder for burning and that’s it, it’s the unburnt hydrocarbons that are killing the two strokes in the emission ring. The same problem killed the two stroke Detroit engine and when the emission laws tighten because of the greenies well
My fuel injected Tenere is soooooo much better in fuel than a carby 660 Tenere with a slower rider than me so I have to say you are fishing for an argument or well, lets say you are fishing :laugh: :laugh:
TB
December 14, 2010 at 7:57 am #192578Not wanting to get into the two stroke vs four stroke fishing comp thing :dry: but can seem to remember one KTM530 bucket hat wearing hombre cutting multiple laps around Louee on a KTM200 Sutto couldnt get him off the thing!! :laugh:
Ollie
December 14, 2010 at 9:35 am #192579what one of these motorcycle companys need to do is put some of Ralph Sarich orbital engine designs into practice and reinvent the 2 stroke as the technology is there with original designs that in 1972 developed a stroke motor that was 50% lighter,30% more fuel efficient, 20% cheaper to make70% smaller and 30% less pollution we are now nearly in to 2011 and as was said in one of the current magazines that some of the motorcycle companys are looking at this design showing a motor with more power , more torque, lighter and also it wouldnt need an expansion chamber anmd could just run a normal pipe. So dont be 2 cocky all you 4 T lovers 2 smokers will be back smaller , faster and lighter
December 14, 2010 at 10:26 am #192590hay TB i was just talking about the modern race style 4stroke bikes(motercrossers and huskys etc) using more fuel than the carby versions which makes no sence to me but they do.yep ollie that 200 was a nice bike need to loose 20kg before i get one of those
December 14, 2010 at 10:27 am #192550Good read but if that was 2003 surely they would have gotten somewhere with it by now.
TB you were saying that the outboards exhaust is in the water and that’s how they get around the emissions laws but surely expelling the gasses and unburnt fuel into the water can’t be good, wouldnt a boat putting its crap into the water be just as bad as a bike putting its crap in the air?I just think it’s funny how they think like that or maybe I’m missing something.Great read and great site TB
Pete
-
AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.