Crf450x vs Crf250x a trailriders view !

Home Forums Rocks Motorcycles Honda Forum Rocks Motorcycles Honda Forum Crf450x vs Crf250x a trailriders view !

This topic contains 24 replies, has 0 voices, and was last updated by  Nick Jackson 11 years, 1 month ago.

Viewing 11 posts - 16 through 26 (of 26 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #241293

    Alan Heather
    Member
    james wrote:
    Do you think that ktm have it right then Nick with the 350 in the middle, and the other manufacturers should follow suit CRF 350x :unsure:

    Back in the 80,s and 90,s Honda had a 350 so did Yamaha and Suzuki they were a great ride I had a tt350 and raced and trail rode it for a couple of years so what happen to that trend? or were ktm just a bit slow to make one.

    #241312

    Matt Baker
    Member

    The 450 you are comparing with is renouned for being very aggresive almost mx like, plus its an outdated model. Try a new WR 450 if you want a smoother engine.

    Or you could just grow a pair, open the throttle and flap off the back of it!

    #241311
    snowy09 wrote:
    singletrackmind wrote:
    Good read Nickj!
    Considering we are a similar ability, ride similar trails and own the same 250, this report has a lot of relevance for me. It seems the summary is that you would have to spend a fair bit of money to get the 450 to suit your area yet you can run an almost stock 250x and it is a better fit. I have to say that I am very happy with my 250x and rarely wish for any more power. If you weigh over 100kg then you are forced onto a bigger bike but at around the 90 kg mark and with the right gearing my bike feels just right. My engine is stock so I do have a bit of room to upgrade should I wish to later on and I too am hanging out to follow Arron’s experiment.
    Of course if I lived at Condo it would be a very different story!

    STM

    hey Scott nick off with your light arse weight comments, nothing wrong with hanging 105kg off the back of the CRFx. In the Nundle singles I have tried all the bigger bikes and they cannot match the power, ride and weight that the 250 delivers and its not just the Honda, Boonys Ktm is just as quick when someone decent rides it, just looks slow and retarded when he is on it.

    I am surprised to hear that Snowy. I would have have picked you at 99.9 kg B)

    STM

    #241315

    Nick Jackson
    Member
    LC4skin wrote:
    The 450 you are comparing with is renouned for being very aggresive almost mx like, plus its an outdated model. Try a new WR 450 if you want a smoother engine.

    Or you could just grow a pair, open the throttle and flap off the back of it!

    :D I was waiting for it LC !!

    I was just comparing what was in my shed at the time but I agree the Wrf would be a more manageable 450 in the tight stuff !!

    As for flapping off the back I’ve done plenty of that with mixed results :pinch:

    Nick

    #241305
    Nickj wrote:
    rookie , did you find the 450 tiring on trail rides before you changed the gearing?

    Nick

    I found in the tighter sections it took a lot more effort to corner smoothly and under control, also found on the hills it kept wanting to brake traction

    Now with the 14t the power is a lot more predicatable and traction is unbeatable … but by no means is it tame Hahaha you snap that throttle and you hang on

    #241270

    Does this mean a postie bike that is even smaller, lighter and has smoother power would be the ultimate single track weapon. 👿 :P

    #241344

    Eric Smith
    Member
    Scotty wrote:
    Does this mean a postie bike that is even smaller, lighter and has smoother power would be the ultimate single track weapon. 👿 :P

    Auto clutch, no need for a recluse! (Not too sure about the “lighter” thing though!)

    I’ve taken Honda CT90’s places you’d not believe in the past though! The things we do as kids eh!

    I’m a subscriber to the smaller is faster theory. Flog a 250F and you’ll be faster and less stuffed than most blokes on a 450F – but not all. For an average trail rider I reckon a 250F is enough, like the perfect ice cream, and a 450 is like a choc dip ice cream with a flake – bloody awesome, but an unnecessary indulgence. 👿

    #241271

    jamie
    Member

    I had a CT90 with the low range selector under the gearbox i think it would tractor through most stuff. B) probably do last years x mas ride easier on it too. :laugh:

    #241296

    Evan
    Member
    Nickj wrote:
    james wrote:
    Do you think that ktm have it right then Nick with the 350 in the middle, and the other manufacturers should follow suit CRF 350x :unsure:

    Spot on James , a 350x could be the one if set up right , I think the 450 would be better if the aggressiveness was taken out of the bottom third of power delivery but it could also be how this one is set up , it’s the only one I have ridden to compare !!

    Can’t wait to see what Aaron thinks to his 300 bore kit too :woohoo:

    Nick

    Due to damage i changed my after market pipe (that you could put your hand in] and put the stock fully restricted one on ,I think it would solve all the things you didnt like about it, it makes the bottom third very smooth and cuts down on wheel spin on big hills but the power is still there when you want it, i reckon its just as quick

    #241369

    Nick Jackson
    Member
    BellingenEv wrote:
    Nickj wrote:
    james wrote:
    Do you think that ktm have it right then Nick with the 350 in the middle, and the other manufacturers should follow suit CRF 350x :unsure:

    Spot on James , a 350x could be the one if set up right , I think the 450 would be better if the aggressiveness was taken out of the bottom third of power delivery but it could also be how this one is set up , it’s the only one I have ridden to compare !!

    Can’t wait to see what Aaron thinks to his 300 bore kit too :woohoo:

    Nick

    Due to damage i changed my after market pipe (that you could put your hand in] and put the stock fully restricted one on ,I think it would solve all the things you didnt like about it, it makes the bottom third very smooth and cuts down on wheel spin on big hills but the power is still there when you want it, i reckon its just as quick

    It’s got a stock pipe fitted mate , it’s just a cranky bugger !!!!

    #241272

    Laurie
    Member

    excellent report, thx Nick, I’ve always wondered about the new crf’s, great to hear something worthwhile from someone who knows… I won’t ever get one cos I like my older bikes, but good to know nevertheless… wheelspin and traction, fun factor without killing ourselves lol…. I too find the xr250 faster/easier to ride sections in than (in my case) the 650… definitely different styles/techniques of riding to get them where we want to and how they want to :)

Viewing 11 posts - 16 through 26 (of 26 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.