xy-transit wrote:
are we correct in thinking that a bike with less rake would handle better than a bike with a longer rake?
.
LC is right 
Less rake steeper angle steer better but more likely to be more nervous at speed longer rake more stable at speed won’t turn in as well is the general rule.
Have heard blokes like Ballard and Grabham say how well XR 250’s steered and yet were still stable. The XL will have a longer rake as such as it was more road oriented.
Years ago I rode a CR 250 (actually a WMW 250) and it was a late 80’s 89 I think, it was the time that super cross was hitting it straps thus everything was super cross orientated including the CR. It had a wicked steep rake setup to turn a 2nd gear berm on a indoor track. It would turn on greased limo with a slick tyre incredible steering but as soon as you got into 4th gear the thing would shake it’s head something shocking! Used to joke that it suffered head shake whilst tied the trailer :laugh: :laugh: There was no such things as steering dampers then.
Things have changed now days we have better suspension, dampers etc I know run my forks thru the clamps of my XR around 15mm, it steers real sharp but if I back the damper off I get arm pump and it shakes it’s head
TB