Too many Ollies

This topic contains 48 replies, has 0 voices, and was last updated by  Anonymous 16 years, 1 month ago.

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 49 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #120069

    Chris
    Member

    Yes yes and yes, no yes yes no,

    I have never had a problem with it, I have set the max to 1024 * 768 from 800 * 600, if someone wants to test it, not to say it will stay that way. We can have the forum opening in it’s own full page but I always thought it looked crap, vbulletin opens in a full page, that’s why you can have bigger images. Maybe TB and I will look into it, but I have never had reason to be concerned. But if it is what the users want then we will look into it. Especially since mr senior moderator has piped up and had a say too.

    Cheers
    Chris.

    O.K all my images in photobucket are already resized to 800 * 600 need to find a bigger one.

    #120073

    Eric Smith
    Member

    IMG_1239.jpg

    Testing

    #120074

    Greg
    Member

    I am with you Chris we will talk, scotch, rum or beer for that talk?

    Am I still getting an esky for that other thing we spoke about last night? And one cartoon will be enough let me know

    TB

    #120077

    Chris
    Member

    Trailboss wrote:

    Quote:
    I am with you Chris we will talk, scotch, rum or beer for that talk?

    Am I still getting an esky for that other thing we spoke about last night? And one cartoon will be enough let me know

    TB

    either, yes and O.K

    #120075

    Anonymous

    That pic you just posted has a dimension of 512 X 384 pixels viewing on my screen. Small as:dry:

    #120079

    Eric Smith
    Member

    I’d like to see larger images Chris. I think the smaller ones detract from the originals, if you see my ride report for Clarence on DBW or ADV you’ll see what I mean.

    Another test image:
    IMG_1243.jpg
    Looks better in the larger size I think. :)

    Edit: I would say 1024×768 should be a minimum, larger would be nice.

    #120076

    Chris
    Member

    ECKS-Man wrote:

    Quote:
    IMG_1239.jpg

    Testing

    O.K hows that look now, that is as big as I am going to go, any bigger and users will have to scroll back and forth to see the whole screen and I know how much Mick hates that.

    Cheers
    Chris.

    #120080

    Chris
    Member

    ECKS-Man wrote:

    Quote:
    I’d like to see larger images Chris. I think the smaller ones detract from the originals, if you see my ride report for Clarence on DBW or ADV you’ll see what I mean.

    Another test image:
    IMG_1243.jpg
    Looks better in the larger size I think. :)

    Nothin wrong with that one!

    #120081

    Anonymous

    Go bigger, at least fit the page a bit better
    I only have a 20′ monitor and it’s half way there..

    Like your missus wishes, go bigger !!!!:laugh:

    #120082

    Eric Smith
    Member

    My 22″ screens make even 1024×768 pretty small so maybe I’m a touch biased, but the bigger the better I think!
    IMG_4251.jpg

    #120084

    Greg
    Member

    The powers are meeting tomorrow evening we will discuss it, moderators everybody, then Chris and I will talk next week, yeah Chris and let you know for sure

    TB

    #120086

    Anonymous

    Trailboss wrote:

    Quote:
    The powers are meeting tomorrow evening we will discuss it, moderators everybody, then Chris and I will talk next week, yeah Chris and let you know for sure

    TB

    Looks like he is making the changes now TB… (You just wanna piss it up)

    #120083

    Chris
    Member

    If I go even a little bigger then you have to scroll right to see the whole page, (based on screen res of 1024 * 768) I generally run my resolution at about 1600 * 1200 depending on what monitor it is, I can make the images very big but then if people are running 1024 * 768 they will need to scroll to the right, then we will have everyone whingeing that they need to scroll to see the whole page if they are running a lower resolution.

    #120085

    Chris
    Member

    ECKS-Man wrote:

    Quote:
    My 22″ screens make even 1024×768 pretty small so maybe I’m a touch biased, but the bigger the better I think!
    IMG_4251.jpg

    Yes if everyone had 22″ widescreen monitors it would be sweet, we could do a group purchase!

    Cheers
    Chris.

    #120087

    Anonymous

    chris72a wrote:

    Quote:
    If I go even a little bigger then you have to scroll right to see the whole page, (based on screen res of 1024 * 768) I generally run my resolution at about 1600 * 1200 depending on what monitor it is, I can make the images very big but then if people are running 1024 * 768 they will need to scroll to the right, then we will have everyone whingeing that they need to scroll to see the whole page if they are running a lower resolution.

    Who runs a small monitor nowadays , you bloody oldies.. I run a 1600×1200 res and those pics are still small.. Just widen the text field again and the pics will become larger..

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 49 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.